Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Reflect Indwelling Urinary Catheter on MDS Assessment

Spring Branch, Texas Survey Completed on 12-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's status by not indicating the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter on the resident's Quarterly MDS. The resident, a female with multiple diagnoses including high blood pressure, diabetes, Parkinson's disease, hypothyroidism, and systemic lupus erythematosus, was admitted to hospice care and had an indwelling urinary catheter placed due to urinary retention. Documentation in the clinical record, care plans, and hospice plans of care confirmed the presence and ongoing management of the catheter, including notes of catheter care and replacement. Despite this, the Quarterly MDS assessment did not mark that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. The MDS nurse stated that the omission was due to reliance on the clinical record and Point of Care charting, which did not reflect the catheter, and acknowledged that the nurse's note indicating catheter replacement was overlooked. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that there was no physician order for the catheter in the clinical record and no documentation of catheter care, and agreed that the MDS should have indicated the presence of the catheter. Interviews with nursing staff and review of the resident's records revealed that the indwelling urinary catheter had been in place since the resident's admission to hospice care, and both facility and hospice staff were responsible for its care. The facility's policy and the CMS RAI Manual require accurate assessment and documentation of such devices, including direct observation and review of all relevant records. The failure to accurately code the presence of the indwelling urinary catheter on the MDS was attributed to incomplete documentation and oversight during the assessment process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙