Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Document Repeat Blood Pressure Prior to Medication Administration

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 12-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one resident, specifically regarding the administration of Metoprolol Succinate, a blood pressure medication. The physician's order required the medication to be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 100 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was less than 60 mmHg, or heart rate (HR) was less than 60. On the date in question, the resident's DBP was recorded as 57 mmHg, which was below the threshold for medication administration. The medication administration record indicated that the medication was given, but the blood pressure and pulse values were documented as 'NA,' with no definition provided for this notation. Further review of the electronic medical record revealed two blood pressure readings for that day: one at 127/57 mmHg and another at 150/69 mmHg. There was no documentation of a repeat blood pressure check or a progress note regarding the administration of Metoprolol Succinate or reassessment of the resident's blood pressure. During interviews, the nurse responsible for administering the medication could not recall the specific event but stated she would typically re-check blood pressure if initial values were outside the administration range. She acknowledged that if she had re-checked the blood pressure, she likely did not document the new values, which would result in a medication administration error. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility's policy required accurate and timely documentation of all assessments and care provided, including repeat vital signs when indicated by medication orders. The lack of documentation for the repeat blood pressure value was identified as a failure to maintain a complete and accurate medical record, as required by professional standards and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙