Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0849
D

Failure to Coordinate Hospice Medication Orders on Admission

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 12-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to effectively collaborate and communicate with hospice representatives to ensure a resident received prescribed glaucoma medications upon admission. The resident, admitted for hospice respite care, had a documented history of primary open-angle glaucoma and was taking three specific eye drop medications at home, as detailed in her preadmission home health paperwork. Despite this information being uploaded into the facility's medical record prior to admission, the medications were not included in the initial hospice orders written at the facility, and the resident did not receive these medications for several days after admission. Interviews revealed that the admitting nurse did not review the medication reconciliation list available in the resident's electronic medical record, relying instead on verbal instructions from the Admissions Coordinator and the hospice nurse. The hospice nurse, in turn, based her medication orders on the medications physically provided by the resident and did not consult the preadmission medication list. The resident and her family reported that the eye drops were brought to the facility and given to staff, but the medications were not administered until several days later, after the issue was discovered by facility leadership. Facility leadership, including the DON and DNS, stated that their process was to follow the orders written by the hospice nurse and not to reference the preadmission medication reconciliation list unless questions arose. The contract between the facility and hospice required joint development and agreement on the plan of care, but in practice, the facility deferred to hospice for medication orders. This lack of coordination and communication resulted in the resident missing several doses of her prescribed glaucoma medications immediately following admission.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙