Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for PASRR and Hospice Status

Kaufman, Texas Survey Completed on 01-07-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the status of two residents. For one resident with cerebral palsy and a developmental disability, the Comprehensive MDS assessment did not indicate her Level II PASRR status, despite documentation in her care plan and PASRR evaluation confirming she was PASRR positive. For another resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and generalized anxiety disorder, the Quarterly MDS assessment did not reflect that he was receiving hospice services, even though his order summary, care plan, and hospice documents all indicated he had been admitted to hospice care. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator revealed that these inaccuracies were due to data entry errors and oversight, with the Coordinator acknowledging awareness of the correct statuses but failing to code them properly. The facility relied on spot checks and audits for oversight, but not every MDS assessment was reviewed. The Administrator confirmed that the MDS Coordinator was responsible for accurate completion of assessments and that errors in coding could affect residents' function and diagnoses. The Regional Compliance Nurse stated there was no specific policy for MDS accuracy, and that the facility followed the RAI manual.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙