Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Ensure Proper Completion of Advance Directive Documentation

Amarillo, Texas Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's right to formulate an advance directive was properly honored. A review of the resident's records revealed that a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order was present but was not properly completed, as the physician's signature was not dated. The paper DNR was signed and dated by the resident and two witnesses, but the physician's signature lacked a date, rendering the document incomplete. Interviews with facility staff, including the LVN, ADON, SW, and DON, confirmed that the DNR was not valid due to this omission, and there was confusion among staff regarding responsibility for ensuring the DNR was correctly completed and maintained. Further review found that a second DNR document obtained from the hospice agency was also invalid, as both witnesses were direct care staff, which did not meet the requirements outlined in the DNR instructions. The facility's policy stated that advance directives would be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy, but the documentation and staff interviews demonstrated that this was not followed in practice. The resident, who had significant medical conditions and was on hospice care, expressed her wish to be a DNR, but due to incomplete and improperly executed documentation, her wishes were not properly documented or ensured.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙