Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0697
D

Failure to Use Resident-Specific Pain Assessment Methods

Live Oak, California Survey Completed on 11-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to use a resident-specific pain assessment for a resident with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, dementia, and gait abnormalities. The facility's policy required staff to consider cognitive and other individual factors when assessing pain and to use a standardized pain assessment instrument appropriate to the resident's cognitive level. Despite this, staff consistently used only the 0-10 numerical pain scale to assess the resident's pain, even though she was often unable to verbalize her pain level or assign a number to her pain. Interviews with staff, including an LVN, the Director of Staff Development, the Director of Nursing, the Medical Director, and the MDS nurse, confirmed that the resident's pain was assessed by observing facial expressions and assigning a number on the 0-10 scale, regardless of the resident's ability to communicate her pain verbally. Staff acknowledged that this approach was not best practice and did not align with facility policy, which called for descriptive documentation and the use of alternative pain assessment tools such as FACES or Wong-Baker when residents could not use the numerical scale. The record review showed that the resident's care plan included instructions to monitor for non-verbal signs of pain and to report symptoms such as changes in breathing, mood, or facial expressions. However, staff did not consistently follow these instructions or reassess the effectiveness of pain interventions as required by policy. Facility leadership confirmed that staff did not adhere to the pain assessment policy and that immediate education was needed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙