Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
F

Failure to Provide Timely Discharge Notices and Notify Ombudsman

Delano, California Survey Completed on 11-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a written discharge notice to a resident and their responsible party prior to discharge, as required. The discharge order for the resident was written by the physician, and the resident was discharged two days later. However, the Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge was only provided to the responsible party on the day of discharge, rather than in advance. The responsible party was verbally informed of the discharge, but the written notice, which included the reason for discharge, was not given until the day the resident left the facility. Additionally, the facility did not send copies of discharge notices to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for twelve residents who were discharged during the review period. The Ombudsman confirmed that they did not receive the required notices, only a list of discharged residents with basic information. The facility's policy requires that a copy of the discharge notice be sent to the Ombudsman at the same time it is provided to the resident and their representative, but this was not done. The Ombudsman had previously notified the facility in writing of this requirement.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙