Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Delay in Ordering Orthotic Consultation and Device

Palm Desert, California Survey Completed on 12-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that an orthotic consultation, as recommended by physical therapy, was ordered in a timely manner for a resident with significant mobility impairments. The resident, who had diagnoses including paraplegia, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis, was identified as being at risk for decline in activities of daily living and mobility. Physical therapy documented the need for an orthotist consult for a left ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) and communicated this need to the interdisciplinary team. However, there was no corresponding order for the orthotic device or referral for consultation found in the resident's medical record. Interviews revealed that the social services director was unaware of the recommendation and had not received communication from rehabilitation regarding the need for the brace. Further review indicated that the process for obtaining orthotic devices involved assessment and recommendation by the rehab department, followed by communication to social services and nursing to obtain an order and schedule an appointment with the vendor. Despite the physical therapist's and director of rehabilitation's efforts to communicate the need for an AFO, including emails to the social services assistant and the DON, no action was taken for nearly a month. The DON acknowledged that this delay was excessive and that there was no policy in place for orthotic consults. This lack of timely coordination and communication resulted in a delay in the resident receiving the necessary orthotic device.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙