Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Incomplete Documentation of Medication Administration

Milwaukee, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 12-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one resident. The resident, who was admitted with a left femur fracture and prostate cancer with bone metastasis, had a physician's order for apalutamide, a hormone blocker used to treat prostate cancer. On a specific date, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated with code 9 that additional details regarding the administration of apalutamide should be referenced in the Progress Notes. However, a review of the Nursing Progress Notes revealed there was no documentation about the administration of the medication on that date. During an interview, an LPN recalled being unable to initially locate the cancer medication, but after a family member identified its location in the medication cart, the LPN administered it to the resident. The LPN was unsure if she documented the administration in the nurses' notes, despite having marked code 9 on the MAR. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the nurse should have either documented the medication as given or provided an explanation in the nurses' notes. The facility's policy requires documentation of medication administration or refusal as per facility guidelines.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙