Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Open Wound and Catheter

Lacey, Washington Survey Completed on 12-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident who required them due to an open wound and the presence of a catheter. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and admitted for rehabilitation after hospitalization, had a care plan indicating the need for EBP. However, during multiple observations, there was no EBP signage on the resident's door, and staff were seen entering the room and providing direct care without donning personal protective equipment (PPE) as required by the facility's EBP policy. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of clarity regarding responsibility for placing EBP signage and understanding of when EBP should be implemented. The admit nurse did not place the required signage during the admission process, and the infection control nurse did not identify the omission during routine checks. Additionally, a nursing assistant was unsure about the specific indications for EBP, and the administrator confirmed that the signage had not been placed as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙