Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0580
E

Failure to Notify Provider and Representative of Critical Blood Sugar Levels

Fredericksburg, Virginia Survey Completed on 12-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to notify the provider and resident representative (RR) of significant changes in condition for two residents with diabetes, as required by physician orders and facility policy. For one resident, multiple blood glucose readings exceeding 400 mg/dL were documented in the medication administration records (MARs) over several dates, but there was no evidence in the clinical record that either the provider or RR was notified of these critical results. The provider's order specifically instructed staff to call the medical doctor if blood sugar exceeded 400, yet this was not done. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that it is standard practice and expectation to notify the provider and RR when blood sugar readings surpass dangerous thresholds, as indicated in the orders. Staff acknowledged that such instructions are routine and must be followed, emphasizing that 'an order is an order.' Despite this, review of the clinical records for both residents showed no documentation of required notifications following high blood sugar readings. The facility's policy on resident change in condition states that the licensed nurse must recognize and intervene in the event of a change, and notify the physician/provider and family/responsible party as soon as the change is identified and the resident is stable. However, in both cases, there was a lack of evidence that these notifications occurred, despite repeated instances of blood sugar levels exceeding the specified threshold.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙