Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Submit Follow-Up Investigative Reports to State Agency

Richmond, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to submit required follow-up investigative reports to the state agency for two residents following incidents involving allegations of neglect and injury of unknown origin. For one resident, who was cognitively intact according to the most recent MDS assessment, an incident report documented an allegation of neglect. However, review of facility records, including fax confirmation sheets and the incident file, did not show evidence that the final investigative report was sent to the state agency within the required timeframe. Interviews with facility staff, including the unit manager and administrator, confirmed the absence of documentation showing submission of the follow-up report as required by facility policy. For another resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease, an incident report documented a bruise of unknown origin. Although initial reporting to the state agency was evidenced by fax confirmation, there was no documentation confirming that the follow-up investigative report was sent within five business days as required. Staff interviews indicated an understanding of the reporting requirements, but review of the fax confirmation sheets and incident documentation failed to provide evidence that the follow-up report was submitted to the state agency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙