Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Verify Blood Glucose Readings for Visually Impaired Diabetic Resident

Rutland, Vermont Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure quality of care for a resident with type 1 diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy by not following physician orders and care plan instructions regarding blood glucose monitoring. The resident's orders specified that blood sugar should be checked before meals and at bedtime using the facility's glucometer, with nursing staff required to observe and verify the reading. The care plan also noted the resident's impaired vision and required nursing staff to read the glucometer after the resident checked their own blood glucose. During observation, a nurse asked the resident for their blood sugar reading and accepted the resident's verbal report without directly observing the glucometer or the reading. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident used their personal glucometer and that staff often relied on the resident's verbal report rather than verifying the reading themselves, despite the resident's visual impairment and the facility's instructions that staff must observe and verify the result using the facility's equipment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙