Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0809
F

Failure to Provide Substantial Snacks and Meal Alternatives Outside Scheduled Meal Times

Burlington, Vermont Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide substantial snacks or meal alternatives for residents who required food outside of scheduled meal times, particularly when there was more than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast. Record reviews and interviews revealed that a resident with complex medical conditions, including end stage renal disease, diabetes, and chronic heart failure, often returned from dialysis appointments late in the evening and did not consistently receive dinner or substantial snacks. Documentation of meal intake was inconsistent, and staff sometimes marked the resident as 'not available' for dinner, even though the resident returned later and required food. Observations and staff interviews confirmed that kitchenettes on the units were not consistently stocked with substantial snacks or meal alternatives, such as sandwiches or salads, after the kitchen closed in the evening. The kitchen manager and nursing staff acknowledged that after the kitchen closed, only limited snack items like pudding, crackers, and chips were available, which did not constitute a meal. There was also confusion among staff regarding their ability to access the kitchen after hours to provide food for residents, and the process for restocking snacks was not reliably followed. Additional interviews with cognitively intact residents indicated that snacks were only available if the kitchenettes happened to be stocked, which was not always the case. Observations confirmed that essential snack items and meal alternatives were missing from the units, and the kitchen manager stated that the kitchen was responsible for stocking these items but did not keep track of inventory. As a result, residents who needed food outside of traditional meal times, especially those returning late from medical appointments, did not have access to suitable and nourishing alternatives.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙