Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Maintain Accurate and Comprehensive Care Plans for Multiple Residents

Granbury, Texas Survey Completed on 12-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that accurately reflected the current needs and interventions for three residents. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment and a stage 4 pressure ulcer, the care plan included an intervention for negative pressure wound therapy, but there was no physician order for this therapy, and staff confirmed the resident was not receiving it. The care plan was not updated to reflect the actual wound care being provided, and the responsible staff indicated that the care plan should not have included this intervention if it was not in use. Another resident with moderate cognitive impairment and on hemodialysis did not have care plan interventions addressing the assessment and monitoring of her condition before and after dialysis treatments. The care plan only included Enhanced Barrier Precautions for the dialysis access device but lacked documentation of ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility or monitoring for complications related to dialysis. Staff interviews confirmed that dialysis care needs were not addressed in the care plan, and this omission was not identified during interdisciplinary team (IDT) reviews. A third resident, who was dependent on staff for transfers and had a history of sleeping in a recliner, had a care plan that did not accurately reflect her current transfer status or sleeping arrangements. The care plan indicated one-person assistance for transfers, while staff and the resident confirmed that a mechanical lift with two staff was required. Additionally, the care plan listed a full code status, but physician orders and documentation indicated a DNR status. Staff interviews revealed that care plans were not updated to match the resident's current needs and wishes, and there was confusion among staff regarding responsibility for maintaining accurate care plans.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙