Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Dignified and Respectful Care During Incontinence Episodes

Rusk, Texas Survey Completed on 11-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity, and did not provide care in a manner that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of her quality of life. On two separate occasions, the resident, who had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, vascular dementia, and muscle weakness, experienced episodes of bowel incontinence and did not receive appropriate assistance from staff with activities of daily living (ADLs) or with cleaning herself and her environment. The resident required maximum staff assistance for several ADLs, including toileting hygiene, as documented in her care plan and MDS assessment. On one occasion, the resident reported having an episode of bowel incontinence after breakfast, resulting in feces on herself and the bathroom floor. She activated her call light for assistance, but the CNA who responded told her to clean up the mess herself and did not offer help. The resident remained soiled and her bathroom uncleaned for several hours, as confirmed by observations and interviews with the resident, her private sitter, and staff. The resident expressed feelings of humiliation and self-isolation due to the lack of assistance and the way she was treated by staff. On another occasion, the resident contacted her representative for help after staff again refused to assist her following an episode of incontinence. The representative arrived to find the resident still unattended and had to request staff intervention. Even then, staff only handed the resident towels from outside the bathroom rather than providing direct assistance. Facility policies and staff interviews confirmed that nursing staff were responsible for cleaning biological waste and assisting residents with ADLs, but these expectations were not met in the resident's care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙