Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Discharge Assessment Coding

Pearsall, Texas Survey Completed on 12-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one resident whose Minimum Data Set (MDS) records were reviewed. Specifically, the Discharge MDS assessment for this resident was incorrectly coded, indicating that the resident was discharged to a short-term general hospital, when in fact, documentation and staff interviews confirmed the resident was discharged home with family. This discrepancy was identified through review of the resident's face sheet, progress notes, and staff interviews, which consistently indicated the resident's actual discharge destination was home, not a hospital. The resident involved had a medical history including type 1 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis, major depressive disorder, and anemia. The error in the MDS assessment was acknowledged by both nursing staff and the facility administrator during interviews, who confirmed that the coding did not match the resident's actual discharge status as documented in the clinical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙