Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Ensure Physician-Ordered Palm Protector Applied for Contracture Management

Mitchell, South Dakota Survey Completed on 12-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple complex diagnoses, including ataxia, stiff-man syndrome, dementia, mood disorder, weakness, repeated falls, malignant neoplasm of the brain, and epilepsy, was not provided with a palm protector as ordered by the physician for contracture management of his right hand. Observations on two consecutive days revealed the resident's right hand was tightly curled with fingers digging into the palm, and no palm protector was in place. The resident stated he only wore the device when working, and a newly hired CNA reported never seeing the resident wear the palm protector. Documentation in the electronic medical record indicated the device was applied, but direct observation contradicted this. Further interviews with staff revealed that while there were instructions and documentation processes in place for the application of the palm protector, there were no scheduled verification checks after transfers or meals to ensure the device was reapplied as required. The facility was unable to provide a policy regarding following physician's orders during the survey. These actions and inactions led to the failure to ensure the resident consistently received the prescribed contracture management intervention.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙