Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Failure to Maintain Resident Health Information Confidentiality

Altoona, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 12-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of a resident's personal health information during a lunch service. The Health Insurance Service Coordinator discussed private medical information, including guardianship, insurance plan, and dialysis details, with the resident at her dining table in the presence of other residents, a family member, and multiple staff members. The conversation took place in a public area where others could overhear, rather than in a private setting as required by facility policy. The resident involved was cognitively intact and able to communicate effectively. She later expressed discomfort with having her personal information discussed openly and stated she would have preferred a private conversation. Both the Health Insurance Service Coordinator and the Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that the discussion should have been conducted in a private area, in accordance with the facility's policy on protecting resident health information.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙