Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Ensure Resident Rights in Admission and Transfer Processes

Beaver, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 12-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents with cognitive impairments or legal guardianship had their rights upheld during the admission and transfer processes. Specifically, one resident with a moderate cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of 11 and diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and mood disorder, signed the admission notice agreement despite lacking the capacity to understand its terms. Staff interviews confirmed that this resident struggled to comprehend the billing process and did not have the capacity to understand the admission agreement. Another resident, who had a court-appointed guardian due to an intellectual disability and schizoaffective disorder, also signed admission paperwork instead of the guardian, contrary to legal requirements. Additionally, the facility did not provide residents or their representatives with a choice regarding transfer destinations for three residents. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease was transferred to another facility without the representative being informed of options or being contacted by the original facility. Another resident with multiple chronic conditions was transferred without the representative being involved in the selection of the new facility. A third resident, with severe cognitive impairment and schizophrenia, was also transferred without the representative being informed or given a choice, and the representative only learned of the transfer from the receiving facility. These deficiencies were identified through review of facility policies, resident records, and staff and representative interviews. The findings indicate that the facility did not ensure informed consent or resident choice in key processes, particularly for residents with cognitive impairments or those under guardianship, as required by federal and state regulations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙