Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Failure to Assess Resident for Sexual Consent After Intimate Incident

Myrtle Point, Oregon Survey Completed on 12-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident was properly assessed for sexual consent following an incident involving intimate contact with another resident. One resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and admitted with chronic lung disease, was involved in an incident where another resident, who was cognitively intact and admitted with heart disease, engaged in heavy petting and placed hands inside the first resident's shirt. Staff observed the incident and separated the residents, but did not immediately assess both individuals for their ability to consent to the interaction or confirm that the interaction was consensual. Staff interviews revealed that after the initial incident, both residents were allowed to remain together in a common area without a timely assessment of their ability to consent. The charge nurse acknowledged that he did not have the opportunity to speak to each resident separately to ensure consent until after a second event occurred. Documentation and staff statements confirmed that the required assessment for sexual consent was not conducted promptly after the incident, which constituted a failure to protect residents from potential abuse or trauma.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙