Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0943
F

Failure to Provide Abuse Training to Dietary Contract Staff

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 12-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that all 18 dietary contract employees received required training on abuse prevention, identification, and reporting prior to working. According to the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, mandated staff training on abuse is required for all staff, including contract employees. However, record review and interviews revealed that the dietary contractor was responsible for providing this training but did not include the necessary abuse training in their orientation or supplemental materials for dietary staff. The DON confirmed that the dietary staff had not been trained on identifying and reporting abuse before starting their duties. Interviews with human resources, the regional director of operations, and the administrator indicated that there was confusion regarding the responsibility for abuse training. The facility expected the dietary contractor to provide the training, but the contractor omitted the abuse training supplement. The contract between the facility and the dietary contractor did not clearly specify the requirement for abuse training, leading to the oversight. At the time of the survey, 141 residents resided in the facility, and none of the 18 dietary contract staff had received the mandated abuse training.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙