Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Ensure Resident Dignity During Care and Dining

Cincinnati, Ohio Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect during both incontinence care and dining. Observations revealed that staff performed incontinence care on a resident with moderately impaired cognition and substantial assistance needs without closing the door or pulling the privacy curtain, leaving the resident exposed from the waist down and visible from the hallway. Staff interviews confirmed that the door remained open during the care, and facility leadership acknowledged that privacy measures should have been in place according to the facility's admission agreement, which guarantees privacy during personal care. Additionally, staff were observed placing clothing protectors on three residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment and assistance needs for eating, without asking for their consent or confirming if it was care planned. Interviews with CNAs and the Administrator revealed that clothing protectors were routinely applied to protect clothing, regardless of resident preference or documented need, and there was no facility policy guiding their use. The facility's admission packet states that residents have the right to be treated with courtesy, respect, and full recognition of their dignity and individuality.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙