Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Request for Electronic Monitoring Device

Columbus, Ohio Survey Completed on 12-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accommodate a resident's preference to have an electronic monitoring device (camera) placed in their room. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes mellitus, dementia, heart failure, depression, chronic kidney disease, weakness, and cancer, required assistance with activities of daily living. The resident's family requested the placement of an electronic monitoring device, and the facility's Social Service Designee sent an email to the guardian of the resident's roommate requesting consent for the device. However, there was no evidence of a response from the roommate's guardian, nor was there any further documented correspondence or follow-up regarding the request. Observation of the resident's room confirmed that no electronic monitoring device was present. Interviews with facility staff, including the Social Service Designee and the current Administrator, revealed that the previous Administrator had been handling the situation, but no additional documentation or communication could be found. Review of the facility's policy indicated that residents have the right to use electronic monitoring devices in their rooms, but the facility did not provide evidence that it had reasonably accommodated the resident's or family's request.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙