Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Implement Effective Pressure Ulcer Prevention Program

Coshocton, Ohio Survey Completed on 12-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement an adequate and effective pressure ulcer prevention program for a resident who was at high risk for skin breakdown. The resident, admitted with multiple diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, chronic respiratory failure, COPD, and impaired mobility, was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living and was assessed as being at risk for pressure injuries. The care plan included interventions such as use of a pressure redistribution cushion, frequent turning and repositioning, incontinence care, and nutritional support. Despite these interventions being documented, observations during the survey revealed the resident was repeatedly found positioned on his back in bed during multiple checks over two days. Further review showed that the resident developed a new Stage 2 pressure ulcer to the right buttock while in the facility, in addition to an existing wound on the left buttock. Nursing staff confirmed that wound measurements were performed only twice weekly and that the resident had not been evaluated by the wound physician for the new ulcer. No additional interventions were implemented for prevention beyond those already in place, and the facility's policy required identification of at-risk residents and implementation of preventive measures. The lack of timely evaluation and absence of enhanced preventive interventions contributed to the development of the new pressure ulcer.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙