Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Timely Identify and Treat Urinary Tract Infections

North Olmsted, Ohio Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to timely identify and treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) for two residents, resulting in deficiencies related to the management of urinary health. For one resident with vascular dementia and a history of urinary tract infections, a urine specimen was collected as ordered, but the results were not completed or reported to the physician or nurse practitioner. The specimen, collected on a Friday, was likely discarded because the lab did not pick up specimens on weekends, and it was not resent. There was a significant delay before a new specimen was collected and processed, during which time the resident did not receive appropriate follow-up for potential infection. Another resident with multiple sclerosis, diabetes, and a neurogenic bladder had an indwelling catheter and was at risk for catheter-associated complications. This resident exhibited confusion, prompting an order for a urine specimen. The initial specimen was collected and reported as probably contaminated, with a recommendation to repeat the test. However, there was no evidence that a repeat specimen was collected or sent to the lab as ordered. Documentation was lacking regarding the collection and handling of urine specimens, and the resident subsequently experienced discomfort, required catheter replacement, and was hospitalized with a diagnosis of UTI and sepsis. Both cases demonstrated failures in following up on laboratory results, ensuring timely specimen collection, and maintaining adequate documentation. The deficiencies were compounded by changes in medical staff and poor communication, resulting in lapses in care for residents with significant urinary health risks.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙