Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plans for Code Status, Pressure Ulcer, and Bed Rail Discontinuation

Knightdale, North Carolina Survey Completed on 11-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were accurately revised and updated for three residents, as required. For one resident with end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, the care plan incorrectly listed the code status as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), despite both the physician's order and the advance directive indicating the resident was a full code. Multiple staff interviews revealed confusion regarding responsibility for updating the code status in the care plan, with MDS Nurses, the Social Worker, and the Administrator each providing differing accounts of who should make these updates. Another resident, who was readmitted with a stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacrum, had a care plan that failed to include a newly developed stage 3 pressure ulcer on the right buttocks, despite a physician's order for wound care to that area. Staff interviews confirmed that the new wound should have been added to the care plan, and that MDS Nurses were responsible for making this update after being informed of new wounds during morning meetings. However, the stage 3 pressure ulcer was not incorporated into the care plan. A third resident, admitted with a history of stroke, had a care plan that continued to reference the use of bed rails even after the rails had been removed due to changes in the resident's cognition and safety needs. Observations and staff interviews confirmed that bed rails were no longer present or in use, and that the decision to remove them had been communicated in a morning meeting attended by the interdisciplinary team, including MDS Nurses. Despite this, the care plan was not updated to reflect the discontinuation of bed rails.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙