Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plans for PASRR and Hospice Residents

Knightdale, North Carolina Survey Completed on 11-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that addressed all required areas for three residents. For two residents with Level II Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) determinations, their care plans did not reflect their PASRR status in a timely manner. One resident's PASRR Level II status was not included in the care plan until several months after admission, despite documentation and staff interviews confirming the requirement. There was confusion among staff regarding responsibility for ensuring PASRR status was included in the care plan, with both the Social Worker and MDS Nurses indicating differing understandings of their roles. Another resident's Level II PASRR determination was not care planned due to the notification letter not being uploaded into the system, which staff acknowledged as the likely cause for the omission. Additionally, a resident who was accepted into hospice care did not have hospice services reflected in their care plan, even though hospice provider notes and the Minimum Data Set indicated the resident was receiving hospice care. Staff interviews confirmed that hospice care should have been included in the care plan, and the MDS Nurse responsible acknowledged the omission. The Director of Nursing and Administrator both stated their expectation that hospice care would be included in the care plan when initiated.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙