Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Documentation of Oxygen Cannula Changes

Scotland Neck, North Carolina Survey Completed on 11-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a medical record regarding the changing of oxygen nasal cannula tubing for a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). According to a physician's order, the resident's oxygen supplies were to be changed every seven days, with the date and initials recorded on the supplies. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that the oxygen nasal cannula tubing was documented as changed on two specific dates by a nurse. However, during an observation, the tubing in use was labeled with a date that did not correspond to the documented change dates, suggesting the tubing had not been changed as recorded. Further investigation through staff interviews revealed that the nurse responsible for the documentation admitted to recording the tubing change on the MAR without actually performing the task on the specified dates. The nurse stated that the change was typically done at the end of the shift but acknowledged it may have been forgotten on those occasions. Both the Director of Nursing and the Administrator confirmed that documentation should not have indicated the tubing was changed if the task was not completed as ordered.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙