Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate Resident Assessment Documentation

Poughkeepsie, New York Survey Completed on 12-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for one out of three residents reviewed. Specifically, a resident admitted with diagnoses including dementia, an intracapsular fracture of the right femur, and type 2 diabetes mellitus was evaluated by Physical Therapy and found to require maximum assistance for bed mobility. However, the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented the resident as dependent for bed mobility, which did not align with the Physical Therapy evaluation. The facility also lacked a policy related to the MDS assessment process. Further review of the resident's care plan indicated a self-care performance deficit due to activity intolerance, confusion, and disease processes, with interventions focused on encouraging participation in self-care. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that the rehabilitation department completed the functional assessment section of the MDS, which was then signed off by nursing. Staff noted that the resident was coded as dependent for bed mobility and questioned the absence of turning and positioning orders or heel elevation. Attempts to interview the Physical Therapist involved were unsuccessful.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙