Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Follow Fall Prevention Interventions as Ordered

Hamilton, New Jersey Survey Completed on 12-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions as outlined in the resident's care plan and physician orders. Specifically, a resident with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with chronic kidney disease was observed multiple times in bed without the required fall mat in place. The care plan and physician order both specified that a fall mat should be positioned on the exit side of the bed at all times when the resident was in bed. However, on several occasions, the fall mat was observed leaning against the wall rather than on the floor as required. Interviews with nursing staff, including an RN and the DON, confirmed that the fall mat should have been in place whenever the resident was in bed, in accordance with the physician's order. The RN stated that the mat was not on the floor due to a broken bed, but could not explain why this prevented the use of the fall mat. The DON and LPN/Unit Manager both affirmed that the fall mat was necessary for resident safety and should be used as ordered. The deficiency was identified through observations, interviews, and review of the resident's medical record and care plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙