Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Complete Required AMA Discharge Procedures

Las Vegas, Nevada Survey Completed on 12-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow required procedures when a resident was discharged against medical advice (AMA). Specifically, there was no documentation that nursing staff discussed the risks associated with leaving AMA, no signed AMA form was present, and there was no evidence that the physician, administrator, or director of nursing were notified as required by facility policy. The incident involved a resident with multiple medical conditions, including narcolepsy, edema, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity, who had been admitted for therapies and ongoing medical management. Prior to the discharge, the resident's family expressed a desire to take the resident home, and caregiver training was scheduled for a later date. On the day of discharge, the family demanded an in-person visit from a provider, which was not accommodated as providers did not come in on weekends unless it was an emergency. The family then called 911, and EMS arrived to transfer the resident. The family informed staff they were leaving, and EMS removed the resident without speaking to facility staff about the discharge. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the expected protocol for AMA discharges was not followed. Staff acknowledged that the AMA form should have been explained and signed, or refusal documented, and that the physician and administrative staff should have been notified. However, there was no documentation of these actions in the resident's medical record. The facility's policy required these steps, but the record lacked evidence that they were completed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙