Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0551
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Power of Attorney for Financial Decisions

Kansas City, Missouri Survey Completed on 12-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's designated power of attorney (POA) was able to exercise financial decision-making rights on behalf of the resident. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired with diagnoses including dementia and muscle wasting, was admitted to the facility for short-term rehabilitation. The admission agreement and facility policies recognized the rights of resident representatives to manage financial matters, but the facility did not properly acknowledge or facilitate the POA's authority during the resident's stay. Upon admission, the facility did not have documentation of the POA, despite the family member (Family Member A) presenting as the financial POA and being listed as such on the admission sheet. The facility staff claimed there was no family contact and no POA on file, and subsequently arranged for the resident's social security direct deposit to be changed to an account under facility control. This occurred even though the POA document, appointing Family Member A as attorney-in-fact for financial and legal matters, was drafted months prior and later presented to the facility. Communication between the family and facility staff revealed confusion and lack of recognition of the POA, with the Social Services Director rejecting the completed POA paperwork and requesting a new document. Interviews with facility staff indicated that there was difficulty contacting family members and uncertainty regarding the resident's capacity and wishes. The resident was described as providing conflicting information and expressing uncertainty about admission decisions. Despite the POA's attempts to clarify their status and manage the resident's finances, the facility proceeded with financial arrangements without proper involvement or consent from the POA, contrary to facility policy and the resident's rights.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙