Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Replace Wanderguard Results in Resident Elopement

Jefferson City, Missouri Survey Completed on 12-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that a resident identified as at risk for elopement consistently had a wanderguard device in place as ordered by the physician. The resident, who had a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and a history of wandering and attempted elopements, was assessed as requiring a wanderguard on the left ankle. Despite this, staff documented on multiple occasions over several months that the resident did not have a wanderguard in place, with no documentation of replacement or explanation for its absence. The resident's care plan and physician orders required the wanderguard to be checked every shift and as needed. Progress notes repeatedly indicated the absence of the device, but there was no evidence that staff replaced the wanderguard or communicated the issue to the DON or administrator. Interviews revealed that some staff believed the resident was no longer a safety risk for elopement, while others did not follow up on the missing device, and the DON and administrator were not made aware of the ongoing issue until after the resident left the facility. The deficiency culminated when the resident left the facility without staff knowledge and was found by a community member sitting on a curb near the facility. The resident was returned to the facility with an abrasion and was not wearing a wanderguard at the time. Staff interviews confirmed a lack of consistent action to replace the missing device, despite repeated documentation of its absence and the resident's known risk factors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙