Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Hand Hygiene

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 12-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement proper infection prevention and control practices, specifically regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and hand hygiene, during direct care for residents identified as requiring these measures. Observations revealed that three staff members, including nursing assistants and a physical therapist, did not consistently wear gowns and gloves as required during high-contact care activities for residents with wounds or other risk factors for multi-drug-resistant organisms. For example, during a transfer and linen change for a resident with cellulitis, lymphedema, and wounds, staff wore gloves but not gowns, and did not always change gloves or perform hand hygiene between tasks. Another resident with wounds and a history of falls was observed during room tidying and linen changes, where staff did not wear gloves or gowns as indicated by EBP signage and care plans. Staff were seen handling soiled linens, resident equipment, and personal items without appropriate PPE or hand hygiene. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent understanding and application of EBP protocols, with some staff acknowledging lapses or uncertainty about when gowns and gloves were required. The facility's policy and care plans directed the use of EBP, including gowns and gloves, during high-contact activities such as dressing, bathing, transferring, and changing linens. However, documentation and staff interviews indicated that these protocols were not consistently followed, and order sets for residents requiring EBP lacked specific orders. The infection preventionist and nurse manager confirmed the expectations for EBP use, but observations and staff statements demonstrated gaps in adherence to infection control procedures.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙