Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Identify and Assess Pressure Ulcer

Renville, Minnesota Survey Completed on 12-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to identify and comprehensively assess a pressure ulcer for one resident with multiple risk factors, including a recent femur fracture, type 2 diabetes, incontinence, and substantial assistance required for activities of daily living. The resident's care plan noted skin integrity impairment and interventions such as encouraging nutrition, hydration, and prompt treatment of skin breaks. Despite a Braden scale score indicating risk, a skin and wound evaluation did not identify an open area on the coccyx the day before the deficiency was observed. During care, nursing assistants discovered an open spot with fresh blood on the resident's coccyx, but the nurse was not called to assess the area at that time, as the resident was leaving for an appointment and declined further evaluation. The following day, an LPN was unaware of the wound until informed and then measured the area as 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm, confirming it was open. The LPN stated that wounds should be photographed, covered, and have a dressing order entered, with ongoing assessment on bath days and daily checks by nursing assistants. However, the wound had not been properly identified, assessed, or documented prior to this, and a nursing assistant reported that a nurse had previously been dismissive when informed of the wound. The facility's policy required prompt monitoring and addressing of skin integrity issues, but this was not followed in the resident's case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙