Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Discharge Rights During Unauthorized Leave

Duluth, Minnesota Survey Completed on 12-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure appropriate discharge rights for a resident who was discharged following a leave of absence (LOA) despite having her LOA privileges revoked by physician order. The resident, who had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type II, infection of the left hip, pain, weakness, and gait abnormalities, was identified as low risk for elopement but had a history of substance abuse and dependence. Her care plan and physician orders specifically indicated that LOA privileges were revoked due to substance use, and she was not allowed to leave the facility. On the day of the incident, the resident left the facility with her family against medical advice (AMA), despite being aware that her LOA privileges had been revoked. Facility staff documented that the resident and her family were informed of the revoked privileges and that leaving under these circumstances was considered an AMA discharge. The resident later contacted the facility and was told she had violated the physician's order and was officially considered to have left AMA. When staff attempted to have the resident and her daughter sign the AMA form, both refused, and staff signed the form with a witness instead. Interviews with facility staff, including the RN, social services designee, administrator, DON, and social worker, confirmed that the resident's LOA privileges were revoked due to substance use and that the decision to proceed with an AMA discharge was based on her leaving the facility without authorization. The administrator and staff indicated that the resident had previously left the facility without permission and had been re-educated, but the final decision to discharge her AMA was made after she left despite the revoked LOA order. Facility policy requires a 30-day advance notice for discharge except in specific circumstances, but in this case, the discharge was processed as AMA due to the resident's actions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙