Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Assess and Document Proper Sling/Harness Size for Mechanical Lift Transfers

Lake City, Minnesota Survey Completed on 12-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comprehensively assess and document the appropriate sling or harness sizes for residents requiring mechanical lifts for transfers, as required by manufacturer instructions. For two residents who utilized sit-to-stand and full-body mechanical lifts, there was no evidence of a formal assessment that included necessary measurements such as height, weight, distance from tailbone to base of neck, or torso circumference. Instead, staff relied primarily on the resident's weight and a laminated chart in the tub room to estimate sling or harness size, without documenting the specific size in the care plan or Kardex. Interviews with various staff members, including RNs, LPNs, nurse managers, and nursing assistants, revealed a lack of clarity and consistency regarding responsibility for assessing sling/harness size. Staff reported that there was no formal assessment process, and that the size was not routinely updated or included in care plans. Some staff indicated that therapy might be responsible for the assessment, while others believed it was the responsibility of nursing. The process described by staff involved using judgment and trial-and-error to determine if a sling or harness fit properly, rather than following a standardized assessment protocol. Manufacturer instructions for the mechanical lifts and slings used in the facility specify that a full patient assessment must be conducted to determine the appropriate accessory size and type prior to each use. The facility was unable to provide a policy or procedure for mechanical lift equipment, and documentation for the two residents reviewed did not include a Mechanical Lift Sling Assessment. The lack of a comprehensive and documented assessment process for determining sling/harness size led to the deficiency identified by surveyors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙