Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Communicate Wound Care Recommendations and Monitor Wound Progress

East Boston, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 12-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Nursing staff failed to ensure that care and services provided to residents with wounds met professional standards of quality. For two of three sampled residents who received wound care services, the facility did not notify the attending physician of recommendations made by wound care clinicians, nor did they adequately monitor and assess the residents' wounds to determine if the areas were improving or deteriorating. Facility policy required that all recommendations from consulting providers, such as wound clinics, be reviewed with the attending physician for approval or denial, and that the effectiveness of interventions be monitored through ongoing assessment and documentation in the medical record. One resident with a history of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, diabetes with neuropathy, and a non-healing left hip surgical wound that developed into a Stage IV pressure injury, was seen monthly at an outpatient wound clinic. The clinic provided specific treatment recommendations, including wound care orders and interventions for pressure injury management. However, there was no documentation that these recommendations were reviewed with or brought to the attention of the attending physician, nor was there evidence that physician orders were obtained for new treatments. Additionally, nursing staff failed to document measurements or monitor the progress of the resident's wounds in weekly skin assessments, nurse progress notes, or treatment administration records, despite facility policy and staff statements that such monitoring was required. Another resident admitted with dementia, repeated falls, and depression, had bilateral unstageable pressure injuries to the heels. The in-house wound care specialist recommended an air mattress for pressure redistribution, but there was no documentation that this recommendation was communicated to the attending physician, and the resident did not have an air mattress in place. Furthermore, after initial assessment and staging of the heel wounds, subsequent weekly skin assessments and nursing documentation failed to record observations, measurements, or monitoring of the wounds' progress. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that recommendations from wound care providers should be reviewed with the attending physician and that weekly wound measurements were expected but not completed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙