Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Documentation of Wound Location in Resident Medical Record

Newburgh, Indiana Survey Completed on 12-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate clinical records for a resident with a surgical wound. Specifically, documentation inconsistently recorded the location of the wound, with multiple entries indicating the wound was on the right plantar foot when it was actually on the left. This error originated from the initial wound note, where the wound nurse mistakenly charted the right foot instead of the left, and this incorrect information was subsequently carried over in ongoing documentation. Weekly skin observations and progress notes continued to reflect the incorrect wound location, and some weekly observations even failed to note the presence of a surgical wound. The resident involved had a complex medical history, including a displaced bimalleolar fracture of the left lower leg, diabetes, hemiplegia, lymphedema, morbid obesity, and chronic heart failure. The care plan and physician orders correctly referenced a surgical wound on the left foot, but nursing documentation and skin observation forms repeatedly listed the wound as being on the right foot. Interviews with staff confirmed that documentation was based on previous notes rather than direct observation, leading to persistent inaccuracies in the resident's clinical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙