Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Prevent Cross-Contamination and Ensure Wound Care Compliance

Chrisman, Illinois Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to prevent cross-contamination during wound care for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and significant mobility limitations. The resident had physician orders for daily wound care to the right ankle arterial wounds, including specific instructions for cleaning and dressing the wounds. Observations revealed that a nurse used the same piece of gauze to cleanse multiple open wounds on the resident's ankle, wiping both the wounds and surrounding skin, which constitutes improper wound care technique and risk of cross-contamination. Additionally, the resident's dressings were not labeled or dated as required. Record review and staff interviews indicated that contract nurses were assigned to the resident for several days, during which time wound care was not consistently performed as ordered. The resident was later found in a hospital with maggots present in the wound, and the dressing was adhered to the skin, suggesting it had not been changed for an extended period. Facility staff confirmed that wound care documentation was signed off as completed, even when the dressing had not been changed, and that there was no system in place to ensure treatments were actually performed or monitored. Further interviews with facility staff, including the DON and wound care nurses, revealed a lack of oversight and auditing of wound care practices, especially during the absence of the primary wound nurse. Staff reported that contract nurses often did not perform wound care, and there was no process to verify that dressings were changed or that physician orders were followed. The facility relied on reviewing treatment records for compliance but did not visually inspect wounds or dressings to confirm care was provided as ordered.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙