Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Educate Resident on Consequences of Refusing Pressure Ulcer Care

Bolingbrook, Illinois Survey Completed on 07-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with multiple diagnoses, including metabolic encephalopathy, osteoarthritis, hydronephrosis, and acute osteomyelitis, developed a facility-acquired deep tissue injury (DTIP) on the coccyx, which later progressed to a stage 3 pressure ulcer and subsequently to an unstageable pressure injury with significant necrotic tissue. The resident was cognitively intact and required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living, including being dependent for toileting hygiene and lower body dressing. The resident refused certain interventions, such as repositioning and the use of a low air loss mattress, which were recommended to prevent further wound decline. Despite these refusals, there was no documentation that the resident was educated about the need for these interventions or the consequences of refusing them. The wound care nurse was unable to provide evidence of education regarding the risks associated with refusal of care, and the risk notification was only reviewed with the resident's power of attorney, not the resident themselves. The care plan initially did not address the resident's refusals regarding repositioning until several months after the pressure injury was identified. Wound assessments documented the progression and worsening of the wound, including increased size and necrosis, but did not indicate that education about the consequences of refusal was provided. The facility's policy required ongoing evaluation of the plan of care and reassessment if the patient was not responding to treatment, but there was no evidence that these procedures were followed in relation to educating the resident about the risks of refusing recommended wound care interventions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙