Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
F

Failure to Respond to Resident Call Lights in a Timely Manner

Silvis, Illinois Survey Completed on 12-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner, as evidenced by multiple resident and visitor interviews, grievance log entries, and direct observations. Residents consistently reported waiting at least an hour, and sometimes up to an hour and a half, for staff to respond to activated call lights. Several residents stated that staff would turn off the call light and promise to return, but then failed to provide the requested assistance. Family members and visitors corroborated these accounts, noting that call lights often remained unanswered for extended periods and that they sometimes had to seek out staff multiple times to obtain help. The facility's own grievance log documented complaints about delayed call light responses, with conclusions indicating staff re-education or counseling, but residents reported no improvement over time. The facility's policy requires that call lights be accessible at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing area, and that all staff are responsible for responding to activated call lights. Despite this, interviews revealed that timely responses were not the norm, except during periods when state agency representatives were present in the facility. During these times, residents and visitors observed that call lights were answered much more quickly, with management and additional staff visibly assisting. The issue was described as ongoing by both residents and the facility ombudsman, who personally witnessed call lights remaining unanswered for over an hour.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙