Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Code UTI on MDS Assessment

Atlanta, Georgia Survey Completed on 12-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code a urinary tract infection (UTI) on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one resident. The resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction and was later transferred to the hospital due to unresponsiveness. Hospital records indicated that the resident was diagnosed with a multidrug-resistant E. coli UTI and treated with antibiotics. Upon return to the facility, the quarterly MDS assessment did not reflect the UTI diagnosis, as the infection item was not marked. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the MDS Coordinator did not code the UTI, believing it should only be coded if the infection occurred while the resident was in the facility. The Resident Assessment Director and the Vice President of Clinical Reimbursement both confirmed that the UTI should have been coded according to the RAI Manual, as the diagnosis and treatment occurred within the required 30-day look-back period. The MDS Director acknowledged that there was no audit process in place to ensure the accuracy of MDS assessments, and regional audits had not yet focused on UTI coding errors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙