Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0725
E

Insufficient Weekend Nursing Staff Coverage

West Haven, Connecticut Survey Completed on 08-20-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,685
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available on weekends, as evidenced by a review of Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data and staff interviews. PBJ data showed that weekend staffing levels were consistently lower than weekday staffing during two fiscal quarters. On specific weekends, scheduled staffing was not met due to multiple callouts, particularly among nursing aides. For example, on one Sunday, six nursing aides called out for the 7-3 PM shift, and only one could be called in, resulting in six aides working instead of the scheduled ten. Similarly, for the 3-11 PM shift, five aides called out, and only three could be called in, leaving the shift short-staffed for several hours. The facility did not provide documentation to demonstrate that resident care needs were met during these periods of reduced staffing. Interviews with the scheduler and administrator confirmed that callouts, including those due to inclement weather, contributed to the staffing shortages. The facility's staffing plan, as outlined in the Facility Assessment, called for 11 nursing aides for the 7-3 PM shift with an average daily census of 83 residents. The assessment also identified staffing as a weakness, citing a unionized workforce and limited availability of per-diem or temporary staff. The administrator was unaware that the facility had been flagged for low weekend staffing in PBJ reports and acknowledged that the facility was not utilizing agency staff during the periods in question. Additionally, the DNS and ADNS occasionally filled in as RN supervisors but did not clock in as direct-care staff.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙