Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Provide Required Supervision for Residents with Severe Cognitive Impairment

Naugatuck, Connecticut Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide supervision in accordance with the care plan for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, resulting in two incidents involving another resident with similar cognitive deficits. Both residents had diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficits, and were assessed as having severely impaired cognition based on their BIMS scores. The care plans for both residents specifically directed staff to supervise them when together, with interventions including every 15-minute checks and, at times, 1:1 observation. On one occasion, a staff member observed the two residents together in a room, left to provide care for another resident, and returned approximately 15-20 minutes later to find both residents in bed without clothing. Although the care plan required supervision when the residents were together, staff did not provide the required level of supervision, and the residents were left alone for an extended period. Assessments following the incident found no injuries, and both residents denied discomfort or harm. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the supervision requirements but revealed a lack of adherence to the care plan directives. Documentation and interviews indicated that staff failed to implement the care plan interventions as written, specifically the need for constant or frequent supervision when the two residents were together. The facility's policy required all clinical department heads to ensure implementation of resident care plans, but the supervision outlined in the care plans was not provided, leading to the incident where the residents were found unsupervised and unclothed in a private room.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙