Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
E

Failure to Monitor and Document Resident Status After Abuse Incidents

East Haven, Connecticut Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents involved in resident-to-resident abuse incidents were properly monitored for injuries, mood, and behaviors as required by facility policy and care plans. For four residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment and psychiatric diagnoses, documentation and monitoring were not consistently completed following altercations. Specifically, after incidents where residents were struck or involved in altercations, there was a lack of documented assessments regarding their mood, behavior, and physical condition on multiple shifts over several days. For example, one resident with vascular dementia and a history of traumatic brain injury was involved in an altercation and subsequently had interventions listed in the care plan, including RN assessment and monitoring for mental distress. However, there were no physician orders or MAR entries for mood or behavior monitoring, and nurses' notes lacked documentation of these assessments on several shifts following the incident. Similar deficiencies were observed for other residents involved in altercations, including those with severe cognitive impairment and mood disorders, where care plans called for monitoring and support, but documentation and orders for such monitoring were absent. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that nursing staff were expected to monitor and document mood, behavior, and skin condition for all residents involved in such incidents every shift for 72 hours. Despite this expectation, the Director of Nursing was unaware that monitoring and documentation were not completed consistently and acknowledged that education and audits regarding this requirement were lacking. Review of facility policy also indicated that staff should observe, intervene, and monitor residents following abuse incidents, but these actions were not consistently documented or carried out.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙