Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision for High Fall Risk Resident

Suffield, Connecticut Survey Completed on 11-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and prevent accident hazards for a resident with significant cognitive impairment and a history of multiple falls. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia and was non-ambulatory following an amputation, was admitted with impaired cognitive status, disorientation, and decreased safety awareness. Despite these risk factors, the initial fall risk assessment categorized the resident as low risk, and interventions were limited to basic fall precautions such as keeping the bed in the lowest position, ensuring the call bell was within reach, and maintaining a clutter-free environment. Over the course of the resident's stay, there were at least seven documented falls, many of which were unwitnessed and occurred despite repeated updates to the resident's care plan. Interventions were added incrementally after each fall, such as bolsters to the bed, padding, frequent toileting, and eventually a chair alarm. However, the resident continued to exhibit impulsive behaviors, attempts to self-transfer, and was only re-directable for short periods. Staff interviews revealed that the facility did not implement 1:1 supervision or 15-minute safety checks, citing staffing limitations. The resident's family was approached about hiring a private nurse aide for supervision, but this was not consistently in place, and at times the aide left or was not replaced. Throughout the period in question, staff and supervisors acknowledged the resident's high fall risk and behavioral challenges, but the facility was unable to provide the level of supervision required to prevent further incidents. The resident continued to experience falls, including one resulting in a stable L1 spinal fracture, and staff reported that close observation protocols were not documented or implemented. The facility's fall prevention program required individualized care based on risk, but the actions taken were insufficient to address the resident's ongoing needs, leading to repeated accidents and injury.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙