Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Elopement of Resident Identified as Wandering Risk

New Haven, Connecticut Survey Completed on 08-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident, identified as an elopement risk with a history of major depression and epilepsy, was able to leave the facility without staff knowledge or intervention. The resident was assessed as alert and oriented, with a BIMS score of 14, and was independent in ambulation using a walker. Despite being under a voluntary court-appointed conservatorship and having interventions in place such as a wander guard and an elopement care plan, the resident was able to exit the facility and cross a street to access a library on another part of the campus. On the day of the incident, the resident exited through the front doors, triggering the wander guard alarm. The security guard at the front desk deactivated the alarm without interacting with the resident or notifying nursing staff, allowing the resident to leave the building. The security guard later stated he did not realize the alarm was triggered by this resident, as he was unaware of the resident's current status as a nursing home resident with a wander guard. The resident was later observed by an LPN returning from the assisted living facility across the street and was escorted back to the building by staff, with no injuries reported. Further review revealed that the facility did not have a specific wander guard policy, although their general policy on elopements and wandering residents directed that adequate supervision should be provided to prevent such incidents. The lack of staff awareness regarding the resident's elopement risk status and the improper response to the wander guard alarm directly contributed to the resident's unsupervised exit from the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙