Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
G

Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision and Fall Interventions for High-Risk Resident

Enfield, Connecticut Survey Completed on 06-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a history of falls, fractures, cognitive impairment, and functional incontinence was admitted to the facility and identified as being at moderate to high risk for falls. Despite this, the resident experienced multiple falls resulting in significant injuries, including rib and wrist fractures, as well as a left femur fracture. The care plan identified several risk factors and interventions, such as keeping the bed in a low position, providing moderate assistance, and ensuring the call bell was within reach. However, the care plan failed to implement a toileting schedule, even though the resident was frequently incontinent and required increased toileting due to diuretic use. Staff interviews and documentation revealed that the resident often attempted to transfer independently, especially to use the bathroom, and did not consistently call for assistance, leading to repeated falls. The facility's documentation and staff interviews indicated that, although the resident was placed on 15-minute safety checks after multiple falls, these checks were insufficient to prevent further incidents. Staff reported that the resident was impulsive, forgetful, and would get up quickly without waiting for help, even when staff were nearby or monitoring the resident. The resident was observed ambulating without staff assistance on several occasions, and staff acknowledged that the only way to ensure the resident did not get up alone would be to provide one-to-one monitoring, which was not consistently implemented. The care plan was updated after each fall, but the lack of a scheduled toileting program persisted despite ongoing evidence that the resident's attempts to toilet independently contributed to the falls. The facility's fall and fall risk policy required staff to identify and implement interventions specific to the resident's risks and to re-evaluate and change interventions if falls continued. Despite this policy, the resident continued to fall, and the interventions in place did not adequately address the resident's needs, particularly regarding toileting assistance. The failure to implement a toileting schedule and provide adequate supervision and interventions for a resident at high risk for falls resulted in repeated accidents and serious injuries.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙